Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Staphylococcus aureus (leading human pathogen) via HiSeq 2000 with ~175M short reads at excellent quality (96.4% Q30) despite moderate N content. This dataset captures the bacterial transcriptome under various conditions relevant to virulence, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance. The large read count and high quality enable robust detection of regulatory RNAs and response to environmental stressors.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0