PRJNA279962

BioProject first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

99/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq of plant with excellent Q30 (89.7%) and minimal adapter content (2.85%) driving near-perfect score. Low N content (0.008%) indicates clean chemistry throughout. Excellent data quality for expression reuse.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Suaeda fruticosa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

12 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 33527165600 reported

total reads 167635828 reported

n content pct 0.008 measured

pct q20 bases 93.8 measured

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured

gc content pct 39.2 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 2.85 measured

duplication rate pct 9.38 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.7 measured ×1 99%

mean base quality 35 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 2.85 measured ×0.4 95%

duplication rate pct 9.38 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 33 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0