Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Pig gut metagenome, amplicon (MiSeq); grade A—suitable for community profiling despite high duplication. Duplication of 90.05% is expected and acceptable in 16S/amplicon work where the target is a set of marker sequences; Q30 of 97.1% and zero adapters ensure accurate OTU assignment and abundance estimation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0