Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA286263

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Abalone (Haliotis laevigata) RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 with 2.03 billion 100 bp reads at 98.2% Q20 and 95.7% Q30 across 228 Gb provides exceptional depth for mollusk transcriptomics. The 44.5% GC reflects molluscan genomes; massive coverage enables comprehensive characterization of tissue-specific, developmental, and environmentally-responsive transcriptomes.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Haliotis laevigata
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
190 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 228651059396 reported
total reads 2027244256 reported
n content pct 0.002 measured
pct q20 bases 98.2 measured
pct q30 bases 95.7 measured
gc content pct 44.5 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 37 measured
adapter content pct 0.63 measured
duplication rate pct 25.6 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.7 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 37 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.63 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 25.6 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 16 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80