Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 5 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Extensive metagenomic RNA-seq of human fecal microbiota via Illumina HiSeq 2000 with high quality (96.9% Q20) and exceptional sequencing depth (4.3B reads), enabling detection of rare transcripts and functional profiling of complex communities. Particularly useful for identifying condition-specific changes in microbial gene expression.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0