Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gut 16S amplicon with good base quality and low contamination. Strong QC (96/100, A) with Q30 of 88.9% and minimal adapter content (0.04%), supporting accurate taxonomy; the high duplication (94.81%) is appropriate for the highly-conserved 16S target and does not compromise the clean reads. Suitable for microbial community profiling and relative abundance studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0