Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
35/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome amplification (WGA) sequencing of Geodermatophilus obscurus (a high-GC soil actinobacterium) via 454 GS FLX capillary sequencing with ~686k reads at moderate quality (pct_q30=20%, likely reporting sequencing platform artifacts). This dataset captures amplified genomic DNA from this extreme-habitat thermophile with notably high GC content (72.1%), which affects sequencing and assembly quality. Researchers should expect elevated error rates and bias from WGA amplification when using this dataset.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0