Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of human skin microbiome via Illumina HiSeq 2500 with exceptionally high base quality (100% Q20 and Q30 bases), spanning ~19M reads. This dataset enables robust taxonomic profiling of skin bacterial and archaeal communities at high resolution. The perfect quality scores and amplicon approach make this well-suited for detecting low-abundance organisms and resolving within-sample microbial diversity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0