Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Massive 16S/18S rRNA amplicon survey of human microbiome via Illumina MiSeq generating ~164M short reads with zero N content and 96.8% Q30 bases. This dataset enables comprehensive taxonomic profiling of human-associated microbial communities at high resolution and sample multiplexing. The high read count and exceptional quality make this suitable for detecting rare taxa and resolving fine-scale ecological patterns within samples.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0