Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Extreme-scale whole-genome sequencing of Columbicola adamsi (a parasitic louse) via HiSeq 2500 with ~2.3B short reads and 93.6% Q30, generating exceptional depth for a single organism. This dataset enables comprehensive genomic characterization of a bird ectoparasite relevant to host-parasite coevolution and microbiome studies. The enormous read count supports ultra-sensitive variant detection and structural variant discovery in this arthropod.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0