Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris (thermophilic bacterium) via MiSeq with modest ~12M short reads at 88.4% Q30. This dataset captures bacterial transcriptomics of an extreme thermophile relevant to understanding adaptation to hot environments. The smaller read count suggests focused sampling of specific conditions, requiring verification of experimental design for reuse decisions.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0