Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of mouse gut metagenome via 454 GS FLX Titanium long-read platform with ~226k reads at moderate quality (65.2% Q30). This dataset enables long-read amplicon profiling of murine intestinal microbiota, particularly useful for resolving full-length 16S rRNA sequences for improved species-level taxonomy. The modest read count and long-read format suggest this may represent a single sample or low-diversity communities.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0