Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Extensive whole-genome sequencing of Acinonyx jubatus (cheetah) via HiSeq 2000 with ~1.96B reads at moderate quality (78.4% Q30). This dataset enables genomic characterization of an endangered large felid relevant to conservation genetics and evolutionary biology. The enormous read count supports ultra-deep variant discovery, structural variant mapping, and detection of population-level genetic diversity despite lower base quality.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0