Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
63/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon (Illumina MiSeq, E. coli K-12) with marginal metrics (63/100, grade D). Q30 of 78.9% (scoring 44/100) is suboptimal for SNP detection, and 94.95% duplication—indicating template saturation—biases abundance toward high-copy targets. Usable only if methods account for saturation; not recommended for quantitative comparative work.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0