Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Bacteroides cellulosilyticus DSM 14838 using 454 GS FLX long-read technology, generating ~315k reads spanning ~79 Mb. This dataset enables long-read-based genome assembly of a cellulose-degrading anaerobic bacterium, particularly valuable for resolving repetitive regions and large structural elements. Long-read sequencing is well-suited for obtaining complete circular genomes in this organism relevant to biomass degradation and anaerobic biotechnology.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0