Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Massive 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of mouse gut metagenome via MiSeq with ~32M short reads at excellent quality (93.8% Q30, 0% N content), spanning from extensive sample multiplexing. This dataset enables comprehensive taxonomic profiling of murine gut microbiota with high resolution for detecting diet-induced or genotype-driven community shifts. The large read count per sample supports sensitive detection of low-abundance operational taxonomic units.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0