Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
19/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-seq (Phytophthora sojae) with severe quality failure (19/100, grade F). Q30 at 59.8% and mean base quality of 24.8 both score zero—far below thresholds for confident miRNA quantification. The 69% duplication and older GASeq II platform compound the failure; resequencing on a modern platform is necessary.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0