Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
36/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus via Ion Torrent PGM with ~120M short reads at moderate quality (66.1% Q30, 0% N content). This dataset captures viral transcriptomics during infection in mammalian hosts or cultured cells, relevant to understanding pathogenesis and antiviral responses. The substantial read depth despite moderate quality supports detection of viral transcripts and host response genes.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0