Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon (Illumina MiSeq, freshwater) with poor quality (33/100, grade F). Q30 at 66.3% (scoring zero) is below the ~85% benchmark, severely limiting taxonomic confidence, and 90.22% duplication indicates over-amplification or limited input. Data should not be reused; obtain fresh samples or alternative source.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0