Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
79/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) with acceptable but quality-constrained QC (79/100, grade C). Q30 base rate of 82%—below the ~85% benchmark for variant calling—scores only 60/100 and is the primary limiting factor. This lower quality from older HiSeq 1000 may reduce SNP sensitivity; consider validation or re-sequencing before variant studies.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0