Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of pig (Sus scrofa) gut metagenome via MiSeq with only ~717k reads at excellent quality (98.6% Q30, 0% N content). This dataset enables basic taxonomic profiling of swine microbiota but the very modest read count severely limits sensitivity for rare taxa and statistical power. The exceptionally high quality suggests this may be a positive control sample or deliberate low-depth sequencing for method development.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0