Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon (Illumina MiSeq, mouse gut) with robust QC (97/100, grade A). Q30 of 89.2% and near-zero adapters (0.02%) provide clean taxonomic reads, and the 96.74% duplication—characteristic of targeted amplicon saturation—is expected. Reusable for taxonomy and community profiling if abundance methods account for saturation bias.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0