← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
[Clostridium] hylemonae DSM 15053
Instrument
unspecified
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
76994134
reported
total reads
292155
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
97.9
measured
pct q30 bases
91.8
measured
gc content pct
48.1
measured
mean read length
253.2
measured
mean base quality
35.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
21.37
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 89/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
91.8
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
21.37
measured
×0.5
58%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0