← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Gorilla gorilla gorilla
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
12968989800
reported
total reads
43229966
reported
n content pct
0.151
measured
pct q20 bases
96.8
measured
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
gc content pct
46.6
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
35.3
measured
adapter content pct
27.45
measured
duplication rate pct
47.26
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 77/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35.3
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
27.45
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
47.26
measured
×0.4
62%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0