Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of a protist with failing grade; the primary constraint is pct_q30_bases (66.7%, measured), falling short of the 80%+ threshold typical for reliable variant calling. The 9.3% duplication rate is concerning for downstream SNV detection. Full measured evidence (strength=1) confirms this is a genuine quality limitation, not provisional.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0