← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
138 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
122745594900
reported
total reads
409151983
reported
mean coverage
10228.8
extrapolated
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
98.4
measured
pct q30 bases
97.3
measured
gc content pct
39.8
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
38.4
measured
adapter content pct
17.39
measured
duplication rate pct
15.92
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
10228.8
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
97.3
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
15.92
measured
×0.5
75%
adapter content pct
17.39
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
15 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0