← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Sus scrofa
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
56 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2065651860600
reported
total reads
10328259303
reported
mean coverage
826.3
extrapolated
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
96.9
measured
pct q30 bases
90.7
measured
gc content pct
41.6
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
35.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0.34
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
826.3
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
90.7
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0.34
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
9 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0