← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
70/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Rhodococcus jostii
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2159238272
reported
total reads
33738098
reported
n content pct
0.032
measured
pct q20 bases
93.3
measured
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
gc content pct
56.6
measured
mean read length
64
measured
mean base quality
34
measured
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
duplication rate pct
85.12
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 70/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
83.6
measured
×1
68%
mean base quality
34
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.07
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
85.12
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
15 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0