Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Gut metagenome whole-genome sequencing on HiSeq 2500 produces 11.2 billion bases (44.6 million reads) with moderate quality (75.6% Q30 bases), capturing microbial and host genetic variation. The dataset supports metagenome assembly and MAG recovery with careful filtering; moderate coverage per organism suits exploratory surveys of community diversity.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0