← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
5 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
186933247600
reported
total reads
934666238
reported
n content pct
0.028
measured
pct q20 bases
88.7
measured
pct q30 bases
81.6
measured
gc content pct
52.6
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
32.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.38
measured
duplication rate pct
30.25
measured
mean target coverage
3015.1
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
81.6
measured
×1
58%
adapter content pct
0.38
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0