Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Plant amplicon metagenome of B grade; pct_q30_bases (86.5%, measured) is solid but slightly below A-tier thresholds, and 96.5% duplication is expected and acceptable for amplicons. Good for community composition studies, though the modest Q30 may limit rare-variant detection. All metrics measured and evidence_strength=1 confirm robustness.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0