Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA321737

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is bulk RNA-seq from the firefly Photinus pyralis on an Illumina HiSeq 2500, and overall it earns a solid B (87/100) — broadly trustworthy for reuse, with the caveat that the grade rests on a thin measured base (evidence_strength=1, with total_reads, total_bases, and checksum only reported rather than independently measured), so the read is somewhat provisional until a fuller measured pass confirms the library-size and integrity figures. The score is propped up by excellent intrinsic base quality — pct_q30_bases of 94.4% and a mean base quality of 35.7 both scored a perfect 100 — meaning the underlying basecalls are reliable and unlikely to introduce spurious variants or alignment errors. What pulls the grade down are adapter_content_pct at 9.56% (scored 58) and duplication_rate_pct at 45.72% (scored 65): the residual adapter signal means you should plan on trimming before alignment or quantification, and the high duplication rate — though not unusual for RNA-seq of highly expressed transcripts — can inflate apparent expression and reduce effective library complexity, so deduplication behavior and saturation are worth checking for any quantitative analysis. In short, the reads themselves are clean and dependable, but expect a trimming step and treat the duplication level as a real constraint on how much independent signal the library actually carries.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Photinus pyralis
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 4165995078 reported
total reads 20140685 reported
n content pct 0.072 measured
pct q20 bases 97.3 measured
pct q30 bases 94.4 measured
gc content pct 39.8 measured
mean read length 126 measured
mean base quality 35.7 measured
adapter content pct 9.56 measured
duplication rate pct 45.72 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.4 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 35.7 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 9.56 measured ×0.4 58%
duplication rate pct 45.72 measured ×0.4 65%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 93