Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This is a bulk RNA-seq dataset from the firefly Photinus pyralis (Illumina HiSeq 2500, 100 bp reads), and it earns a solid grade-A verdict that you can trust at face value: the evidence strength is 1, meaning every contributing metric was directly measured rather than extrapolated, so the reading is definitive, not provisional. The grade is driven upward by excellent sequence quality — 93.7% of bases at Q30 and a mean base quality of 36.4 both scored a perfect 100 — which means base calls are reliable and variant or expression estimates won't be limited by sequencing error. The single largest drag is a duplication rate of 42.96% (scored 71), which pulls the most weight; for RNA-seq this is partly expected from highly expressed transcripts rather than pure PCR artifact, but it does reduce effective library complexity, so for quantitative reuse you should deduplicate cautiously and check whether low-abundance transcripts are well represented. Adapter content (3.79%) is a minor secondary deduction and is trivially handled by standard trimming, leaving this a strong, reusable dataset.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.