Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read capillary WGS with marginal quality; Grade D reflects the critically low pct_q30_bases (49.7%, measured), where less than half the bases meet stringent quality standards—this impacts accuracy for variant calling. Coverage is adequate at 29.8x but extrapolated rather than measured, and evidence_strength=0.61 indicates this reading is provisional pending deeper validation.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0