PRJNA339291

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

68/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Borreliella burgdorferi

Instrument

NextSeq 500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

9 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5317271982 reported

total reads 80564727 reported

n content pct 5.546 measured

pct q20 bases 86.5 measured

pct q30 bases 81.3 measured

gc content pct 20.9 measured

mean read length 33 measured

mean base quality 31.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 42.24 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 68/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.3 measured ×1 56%

mean base quality 31.8 measured ×0.6 63%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 42.24 measured ×0.4 73%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0