Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse gut metagenome amplicon-seq on MiSeq generates 4.5 billion bases (8.1 million reads) with moderate quality (74.7% Q30 bases), suitable for microbiota composition profiling. The dataset offers reasonable depth for assessing microbial community structure and relative abundance in mouse models, a standard experimental system for host–microbiota studies.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0