Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read nasopharyngeal amplicon metagenome of perfect grade A; pct_q30_bases (90.6%, measured) and zero adapter content (measured) are exceptional for PacBio, enabling full-length 16S reads and high-resolution taxonomy. The long read length (1420 bp, measured) and high duplication (77.88%, typical for amplicons) support species-level resolution. Evidence_strength=1 confirms readiness for publication.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0