Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
454 GS FLX whole-genome sequencing of Streptomyces viridosporus ATCC 14672 (antibiotic producer) with 20.5 million reads and 1.19 Gb at moderate quality (91.9% Q20, 25.6% Q30). 454 long reads benefit GC-rich actinomycete assembly; lower Q30 requires polishing for variant applications.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0