Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This bulk RNA-seq dataset from the fungus Morchella importuna on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generated 57 million reads with exceptional quality (95.9% Q30), suitable for gene expression and transcriptome assembly studies. Researchers examining fruiting body development, metabolic adaptation, or secondary metabolite biosynthesis in mushrooms will find high-confidence transcript quantification data. The 48.8% GC content is typical for eukaryotic transcriptomes and supports reliable read mapping.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0