Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human metagenome whole-genome sequencing via HiSeq 2500 produces ~71 billion bases (287 million reads) with moderate quality (82.8% Q30 bases), capturing microbial community and host genetic variation simultaneously. The dataset enables simultaneous investigation of gut or other microbiota composition and host genomic background, though moderate quality requires careful assembly and variant-calling parameters to minimize spurious calls.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0