Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
42/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hybrid short- and long-read genome sequencing of Micrococcus sp. KBS0714 via GridION produces 2.85 billion bases (8.8 million reads) with very low Q30 bases (0.2%), as expected for Oxford Nanopore long-read technology. This hybrid dataset enables scaffolding of short-read assemblies and resolution of repetitive genomic regions inaccessible to short-read-only approaches, despite lower read accuracy.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0