Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This hybrid-read WGS dataset of Arthrobacter sp. KBS0703 on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 contains 951,000 reads with 87.7% Q30 quality and exceptionally high 63% GC content, characteristic of actinobacterial genomes from soil environments. Researchers studying soil bacteria, antibiotic biosynthesis pathways, or high-GC bacterial genomics will benefit from hybrid sequencing enabling assembly of repetitive and GC-rich genomic regions. The dataset demonstrates successful sequencing of environmental isolates with challenging genome composition.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0