PRJNA374677

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

80/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Enterobacter asburiae WGS from an Illumina HiSeq 2500 with 147 million short reads at 83% Q30, generating 36.9 billion bases. The depth supports bacterial genome assembly and pathogenicity characterization.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Enterobacter asburiae

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

104 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 36958878750 reported

total reads 147835515 reported

n content pct 0.804 measured

pct q20 bases 90.8 measured

pct q30 bases 82.5 measured

gc content pct 38.4 measured

mean read length 125 measured

mean base quality 34.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.06 measured

duplication rate pct 6.93 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 80/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.5 measured ×1 63%

duplication rate pct 6.93 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0.06 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 51 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0