Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 4000 whole-genome sequencing of Gossypium hirsutum (upland cotton) with 12.7 billion short reads and 3.05 Tb at moderate quality (83.1% Q20, 66.5% Q30). Enables large-scale assembly and structural variant analysis in this polyploid crop; lower Q30 suggests filtering and polishing steps will be needed.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0