Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This small but exceptionally clean human gut metagenome amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq shows perfect 100% Q20/Q30 base quality across 1.6 million reads, suggesting either stringent quality filtering or a highly controlled single-sample study. Researchers needing a high-confidence baseline or positive control for microbiome protocols will find this dataset useful; however, the limited read count restricts statistical power for comprehensive community analysis and rare-member detection.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0