Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) whole-genome sequencing via the legacy 454 GS FLX Titanium platform yields 146 billion bases (711 million reads) with moderate quality (85.3% Q30 bases). This dated-platform dataset provides substantial sequence volume for insect genomics and pest-biology studies, though 454's longer reads and different error profile warrant platform-specific assembly parameters.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0