Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) bulk RNA-seq on the older Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx yields 400 billion bases (1.8 billion reads) with moderate quality (84.3% Q30 bases), providing extensive transcriptomic data. The large volume supports isoform discovery and annotation in this pest insect, though older instrument chemistry may introduce platform-specific biases; well-suited for transcript assembly and abundance estimation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0