PRJNA38349

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

80/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bacterial WGS of B grade; pct_q30_bases (82.3%, measured) is solid for genome assembly though slightly below gold-standard thresholds, and low duplication (7.56%, measured) indicates clean sequencing. All measured and evidence_strength=1; suitable for draft or closed genome assembly with appropriate consensus refinement.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Bacteroides sp. 2_1_22

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

5 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 163913274 reported

total reads 586876 reported

n content pct 0.012 measured

pct q20 bases 94.8 measured

pct q30 bases 82.3 measured

gc content pct 42.1 measured

mean read length 241.6 measured

mean base quality 33.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 7.56 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 80/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.3 measured ×1 62%

duplication rate pct 7.56 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 1 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0