Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Long-read soil amplicon metagenome with failing quality; pct_q30_bases=0% and mean_base_quality=10.3 (measured) indicate systematic low quality typical of early-generation MinION runs—virtually no bases meet stringent accuracy thresholds. Requires aggressive error-correction before taxonomic analysis is viable. Not recommended for reuse without pre-processing.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0