PRJNA393963
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human whole-exome sequencing on HiSeq 2500 with 277 million 92 bp reads at 98.8% Q20 and 96.2% Q30 across 65.2 Gb provides comprehensive coding-region coverage for rare-variant discovery. The 51.7% GC is typical of exonic regions; minimal N-content and high base quality support sensitive detection of loss-of-function mutations and complex rearrangements in clinical or research contexts.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.